Cyclr vs. Prismatic
Sophisticated software companies prefer Cyclr
Why choose Cyclr over Prismatic?
Prismatic, like Cyclr, is an Embedded iPaaS vendor. Prismatic is, however, newer to the market with a less mature product. Prismatic make bold claims on their website about feature superiority but achieve this by getting the feature suite of Cyclr (and other iPaaS products) incorrect in their comparisons.
Cyclr is richer in experience than Prismatic, we have been building our embedded iPaaS for a much longer period.
Our design ethos is that an embedded iPaaS should save you substantial time and open-up your integration eco-system creation and maintenance to a wider technical and non-technical audience. Cyclr therefore carries a higher degree of abstraction than Prismatic.
Cyclr is flexible to scale with your usage and offers additional developer friendly advanced features, so you can roll your sleeves up and get into the technical detail – but only should you choose to do so.
Talk to Sales
Cyclr and Prismatic Comparison Diagram
Cyclr is a robust and fully developed platform offering extensive pre-built connector coverage and highly flexible deployment options. Alongside its library of pre-made and abstracted components, Cyclr enables you to build custom connectors and define your own UI. Its intuitive workflow builder caters to both developers and non-developers, making integration design and management accessible across teams.
Cyclr is an excellent choice whether your integration patterns are standardized or dynamic and complex. Its pricing model follows a predictable, infrastructure-style structure that scales with the number of applications you connect—without charging per integration, trigger, or user. Cyclr also remains agnostic to connector usage volume, giving you freedom to scale integrations without unexpected costs.
Prismatic, by contrast, is a capable technical toolkit but does not equally empower both developers and non-technical users within the integration workflow. While it’s a credible player in the embedded iPaaS market, it typically requires a dedicated development team to manage and deliver integrations. Prismatic’s pricing may appear attractive at first but can escalate quickly, as costs increase linearly with each active integration “instance” you deploy.
Cyclr and Prismatic Comparison Table
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Managed Connector Library Size | 7 | 3 |
| Platform Maturity | 7 | 4 |
| Ease of Operation | 7 | 5 |
| Initial Affordability | 5 | 7 |
| Affordability at Scale | 9 | 6 |
| Multi-Tenancy Capabilities | 10 | 8 |
| White Label Features | 9 | 7 |
| Enterprise Capabilities | 9 | 6 |
The basis for scoring from perspective of embedded use-case.
Why users choose Cyclr over Prismatic
“Cyclr provides a great balance of ease of use, and technical flexibility. The amount of connectors provided, and the ability to create your own means there are technically no limitations.
You can create bespoke accounts for clients and embed the builder directly to your own software. This makes things like authentication, and modification easy for everyone, not just the technical managers.”
Otto K, CTO
G2 Reviews“Cyclr allows SaaS products to scale integrations with low-code. They provide fantastic support, onboarding and knowledgable staff.
The Cyclr platform is far more flexibile than other iPaaS providers such as Zapier. It’s intuitive to use but with a great deal of depth under the surface. Customising and integrating new products is now quick and affordable for us.”
Leo H, Senior Product Manager
G2 Reviews“They've got a solution for everything. Usually through simple drag and drop. But if all else fails, scripting can solve just about any use case. Their support is top notch!
Integrations take a lot of time to develop internally. Outsourcing this to Cyclr saves us a ton of time and money.”
Cory B, Co-Founder & CEO
G2 ReviewsAI conversations that integrate seamlessly
Deliver real-time, voice-to-voice AI interactions, automating workflows and syncing data across CRMs and messaging platforms, all without writing custom code.
- Integrations: Connects effortlessly with CRMs like HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive via Cyclr’s pre-built templates.
- Automation: Triggers workflows for SMS, WhatsApp, and email messages based on AI conversation outcomes.
- Customization: Rapidly builds new integrations or modifies existing ones using Cyclr’s low-code, drag-and-drop interface.
25% increase in sales
Cyclr’s integration capabilities enabled Neural Voice to deliver tailored solutions faster, boosting ROI and reducing manual workload.
Every integration your customers need, in one platform
Scale integrations without slowing down product teams, delivering faster onboarding and seamless data syncs across CRMs, email, and marketing tools.
- Connectors: Extend core integrations with 35+ new systems on top of their in-house set.
- Workflows: Standardize onboarding, cut builds from 3 days to 4 hours, and sync customer data in real time.
- Maintenance: Offload connector upkeep and updates to Cyclr, freeing engineers to focus on product.
83% faster
Force24 slashed integration build time from days to hours, supporting 50–60M monthly API calls with ease.
Cyclr is the preferred platform of the discerning SaaS company
See why Cyclr is rated 4.8/5 stars by our customers on G2!
“Being able to integrate with multiple other SaaS products is a critical part of building a wider partnership eco-system.
Cyclr’s powerful embeddable iPaaS platform enabled us to rapidly accelerate this process and build complex, multi-step integration workflows quickly and reliably.”
G2 Review from Cyclr Customer
Co-Founder & CEO Enterprise
Loved by customers around the world
